Boot Key Harbor
"Marathon- the Heart of the Florida Keys"

An On-Line Cruising Guide for the Florida Keys & Cuba
Best viewed at 1024x768 or higher

The Time is Now for a new political approach to Cuba
U.S. Representative Jo Ann Emerson, Missouri
presented at the National Summit on Cuba, September 17th 2002, Washington DC
Rep. Emerson represents Missouri's Eighth District. She serves on the House Agriculture Appropriates Committee  and is a founding member of the Cuba Working Group
DISCLAIMER: To all readers of this information, including U.S. Government agencies, officials and representatives:  Nothing in this website does, nor is intended to, encourage illegal activity of any type whatsoever including illegally spending money in Cuba or violation of any part of the U.S. Embargo against Cuba or any other law by U.S. citizens or others. We believe all information reported here, and all activity within this organization and website, to be within the allowed scope of the law, and all readers are encouraged to validate this for themselves. The purpose of information presented on this website is simply to help people in both Cuba and the U.S.. We hereby assert our claim to all of our U.S. Constitutional Rights including Freedom of Speech.

RETURN TO THE NATIONAL SUMMIT ON CUBA PAGE
RETURN TO THE CUBA PAGE
RETURN TO THE HOME PAGE

More than four decades ago the United States, in an effort to topple communist dictator Fidel Castro, cut off trade between the small island country of Cuba and the United States. Today, 43 years later, Castro is still in power and pursing trade and commerce with virtually every country but the United States. If stripping Castro and his communist cohorts of power was our goal, then our sanctions policy is working about as well as honey to keep away flies.

The reality of the situation is that our sanctions policy hasn't promoted change in Cuba. Instead, the US farmer remains on the sidelines and out of the world market.

If the failed sanctions policy isn't reason enough for the US to consider a strategy of economic engagement, consider who wins and loses under the embargo. The US farmer loses because when we shut off trade with Cuba, the farm lost a vital and important market for US trade. For instance, in the 1960's Cuba was the number one market for US rice; in the 70's, it was Iran and in the 80's, it was Iraq. Embargoes against all of these countries closed those markets to our producers. Despite our policy, the countries survived because other countries were ready and willing to sell their products. The lesson we have learned is that the embargoes failed -- and at the same time failed our farmers.

America's decision to use food as a weapon of foreign policy has had a significant impact on the United States. America's economy is losing up to $1.24 billion a year in agricultural exports because of the embargo, and up to $3.6 billion more a year in associated economic output, according to an independent report by Texas A&M University. The top ten states listed as having the most potential to export products to Cuba are Arkansas, California, Iowa, Louisiana, Texas, Illinois, Mississippi, Minnesota, Nebraska and Missouri. Similarly, products that could be exported included rice, soybeans, wheat, chicken, meat, softwood logs, corn, fertilizers, beef and pork.

Over the last several years small steps have been taken to reclaim a market within Cuba. In 2000, Congress passed the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000. The legislation allows U.S. farmers to export agricultural commodities to Cuba for the first time since 1962 and opens the door for sales of U.S. agricultural commodities through third-party financing to Cuba and several other countries.

Last November, following the aftermath of Hurricane Michelle, our legislative efforts began to pay off. Cuba made the first of several purchases of agriculture products such as rice, wheat and soybeans. Most recently they have made other purchases like peas, lentils, apples and chicken. To date, Cuba has purchased more than 238,000 metric tons from more than 30 US States -- and paid the US more than $72 million in cash.

While opening our markets is good for our farmers, it is also a way to introduce democracy into a communist society. We have seen it to some degree in China and the Soviet Union and with a persistent US presence, we can see it in Cuba too. As a member of the House leadership once said when speaking of a US presence in communist China "T reach them we must be there, on the ground, spreading our values and the knowledge that there is a far better, nobler form of government than communism . . . Expanded trade, which increases interaction with American values, is essential to changing a closed society."

Although critics may disagree, there is a growing movement in Congress and across America toward a more pen and responsive attitude toward Cuba policy. Recent surveys from independent pollsters show 71 percent favor allowing American companies to sell food to Cuba. The most telling statistic of all is that an overwhelming 84 percent of Cuban-Americans in Miami-Dade believe the U.S. embargo against Cuba has failed - a sentiment shared by many of their family members I met who are living and suffering in Cuba today.

By establishing better relations with Cuba now, America can guide Cuba toward a steady and permanent landing to democracy. But the longer America waits, the longer the Cuban people suffer -- and the longer the American farmer suffers right along with them.

 

Boot Key Harbor website created and maintained by Capt. Gregory T. Absten, Marathon.  - A Boater's Guide to the Florida Keys & Cuba
Copyright 2000-2008 Gregory T. Absten