|
 |
Boot Key Harbor
Rules & Regulations - plus regulatory issues
↓

*NOTE, Sept 2007: This page is now very outdated and has been temporarily
removed from the Navigational Structure of the website. If you're here it's
because a webcrawler still sees it, or we missed a link to break on this
website.
The page will be redone in the future, but essentially only list the links for
the City of Marathon, Harbormaster.
In the interim please call them for any information about moorings, or use of
the City Marina.
|
CAUTIONARY NOTES FOR
LOCAL POLITICIANS AND CANDIDATES, January 2003 - Reaffirmed July 2003:
Please proceed with the utmost caution in any actions concerning this harbor. I
am hearing increasing rhetoric about "cleaning up" the harbor and making
it "profitable" with moorings. Some that I hear this from have little knowledge
or experience about navigational and anchoring rights and responsibilities (on
both ends), or the true human value aspects of all the local boaters that live
in this harbor. These are mostly good people who I would entrust with my life.
You must refrain from over-regulating this harbor. Yes, a
clean up of some of the derelict vessels is highly desired, and current marine
and local laws on discharge should be reasonably enforced. Turning the harbor
into a shiny but superficial tourist ornament is a gross disservice to the long
term well being of our community. It should grow as a REAL maritime harbor for
REAL cruisers as a crossroads to Cuba, the Bahamas, Leeward
Islands and Central and South America. Do NOT make the harbor mostly moorings,
and do NOT turn up the heat with local law enforcement on
unnecessary and harassing boardings whose sole purpose is only to make it such a
nuisance to be in the harbor that the locals will be
driven out. This will leave the harbor sterilized of its character and open only
for the transient tourists. I'm told by reliable sources that this is the
prime intent of some of the big developers for this harbor - up to the point of
building the mega resort on Boot Key whose view is not to be "tarnished" by all
the locals in the harbor. For those of you that have been empowered by us as
citizens to help manage our community, please recognize that while making money
is productive for our lives up to a point, there also comes a point of
diminishing returns where the quality of life for the community overall is
degraded in order for a few to make increasing profits. We really do NOT want to
become an annex of Duval street here in Marathon. We must stake our claim now
for a fully nautically functioning and fair harbor - especially as Cuba opens up
in the next few years. For those of you new on the political scene I'd like you
to be aware that there have been several Boot Key Harbor advisory committees
over the years. Even though the participating members were sincere and honest in
their efforts, the local county and city authorities who commissioned these
committees have used them mostly as a show piece so they could present an image
of credible public input. Historically anyway nothing could be farther from the
truth. Almost all of the good recommendations by these committees have been
ignored entirely, or distorted out of context. There is enough information here,
both with the full reports of previous committees and my discussion of current
laws and regulations, to give you a full and balanced view of issues concerning
the harbor. I believe that serving in public office is an honorable calling, and
there are still those with the dignity, courage and selflessness to steward this
valuable resource called Boot Key Harbor that we have been entrusted
with. Please be one of them.
- Gregory Absten, Marathon
NATIONAL LIVEABOARD THREAT
Article Sept-Oct 2003 Passagemaker Magazine - 972kb large file (broadband
suggested)- Includes discussion of Boot Key Harbor here in Marathon
|
HISTORY OF PROPOSED REGULATIONS:
Previously Proposed Harbor
Management Plans
- County - 1999-2000 -
Listed here for comparison and history
BOOT KEY HARBOR AD HOC COMMITTEE's
Goals, Option, And Solutions
for Boot Key Harbor, Marathon Key - 1997
(The 1997 report of the Ad Hoc Harbor Advisory Committee - Endorsed by
this Website, but current regulations are not consistent with this report)

Download free copy of Acrobat Reader |
2003
City of Marathon Marina Regulations
(also covers moorings in the Harbor):
City of Marathon Website |
Regulatory & Legislative Issues
Regarding Anchoring & Liveaboards:
Anchoring Away: Government Regulations and
The Rights of Navigation in Florida (pdf file 33pages)
Thomas T Ankersen, Richard Hamann
Center for Governmental Responsibility
University of Florida, Levin College of Law
Boat Liveaboards in
the Florida Keys
a New Factor in Waterfront Development (1990)
University of Florida, Florida Sea Grant Program
VERY Large File - we suggest a broadband connection - takes a long time
A look at the financial contribution that liveaboards make to the local
economy, and discussion of conflicts that occur between use of shoreline and
community resources between land and water dwellers. pdf file 204 pages.
Website - Florida SeaGrant
Local Restrictions on Anchoring in SW Florida (2003)
University of Florida, Florida Sea Grant Program
This is a summary of the SW Florida Regional Harbor Boards efforts to
"harmonize" local restrictions on anchoring in various harbors in Punta
Gorda, Naples, Marco Island, Cape Coral, Ft Myers, Ft Myers Beach, Sanibel,
Bradenton, Palmetto, Longboat Key, Sarasota and Venice. It includes access
to the full text of every Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the regional
harbor board and each of these communities. |
Boot Key Harbor is in the
development stages of a management plan for the Harbor - currently by the City
of Marathon. Here you'll find the official recommendations of this Boot Key
Harbor website, on a balanced approach to management of the Harbor by the City of
Marathon. These are the informed editorial views of the webmaster and are
recommendations to the City and Marathon residents. We also reference related
issues and existing laws such as the clean water act. In a nutshell, this
website endorses the original recommendations of the Boot Key Harbor Advisory
Committee, and you'll find the link to that complete report lower on this page.
Essentially those recommendations included a mooring field which would be
LIMITED to 25 moorings (not the entire harbor), preserved most existing
anchorages, opened up canals for water flow in/out of the harbor, and made a
"honey-barge" and pumpouts available in the harbor. The position of the harbor
master - currently the City Marina Dockmaster - should be one of Ambassador for
the City of Marathon, in contrast to primarily a law enforcement officer. Boats
that are moored or anchored in the harbor long term (more than one month) should
be registered with the harbormaster. This should expose those boats that are
simply "stored" here as cheap long-term storage, and this should not be
permitted. That would help us eliminate many of the derelict boats that are
simply left in the harbor to eventually sink. All boats in the harbor should be
navigationally operational and registered. This means that some floating
contrivances such as makeshift barges might have to be removed, but it does NOT
imply that boats which are simply unattractive should be moved. The single most
important difference in Boot Key Harbor and any other harbor is it’s large, full
time liveaboard population. By and large, these are decent, respectable people -
many of whom are very well educated. They are incredibly important to our local
economy because a huge segment of our service workers come from here. Sterilize
the harbor and you’ve lost character, good neighbors and much of the work force
in Marathon. Arrangements with the Bay Bottom in the harbor - between State,
County and City, is very important to ensure that there are no time limits
imposed on anchored boats in this harbor, so that liveaboards remain possible -
without having to take a mooring if they so choose. The city should formally
recognize this as a defacto residential community, whether or not it meets
technical definitions of a legal domicile.
Code of Federal Regulations on
No Discharge in the Keys:
EPA No Discharge Zone Code of Federal Regulations
Document (also pdf) May 2002 Final Rule
for further info or map of pump-out facilities go to
www.co.monroe.fl.us/ndz/info.htm
or reef relief at www.reefrelief.org
For Clarification
purposes, this CFR (Code of Federal Regulations - 40 CFR Part 140) contains the
following provisions. I list them here because local enforcement officials in
Marathon imply that these alternatives are invalid and attempt to impose
personal agenda's on enforcement of this CFR. Read it in it's entirety (above)
to see what it really says. Among them:
-
p9, paragraph 3 - a
portable toilet is an ACCEPTABLE alternative to a type III MSD (Holding Tank)
-
p9, paragraph 3 -
Shoreside toilet facilities, such as at a marina, is an ACCEPTABLE alternative
to a Holding Tank.
-
p11, paragraph 5 - Type
I & II Marine Sanitation Devices are disallowed in the No Discharge Zone (These
systems treat the wastewater more effectively than shoreside wastewater
facilities but do not remove nutrients like Nitrogen and Phosphorus). The are
specifically disallowed because of the discharge of Nutrients. This page states
that wastewater nutrients from ALL vessels throughout the Keys is estimated to
be only 2.8-3% of the total nutrients discharged into near shore waters of the
Florida Keys.
-
p12, paragraph 4 - The
no discharge applies ONLY to State Waters of the FKNMS. It is legal to pumpout
past the state water limit, and certainly outside of the FKNMS boundaries. This
is what we and many other boaters do when underway offshore. (The no discharged
zone is mapped at
http://www.fknms.nos.noaa.gov/
MY POSITION on
no discharge, pumpouts and "clean marinas": Don't mistake my objections to
enforcement issues with objections to clean water. Pumping your poop in near
shore waters, especially marinas, canals and the harbor, is uncouth and
unacceptable. However, we already had laws that prevented such discharge.
I do believe in responsible boaters exercising responsible alternatives. Many
boaters in marinas choose to use the shoreside facilities because its much
easier and less work in maintaining their onboard system. The CFR's recognize
this as perfectly acceptable, but I've heard local officials bluntly state that
this is not acceptable and demand that these boats pump out. My objections are
with such arbitrary and misleading enforcement. The law does NOT REQUIRE that
one pumpout, only that you abstain from discharging into the water. This is
perfectly reasonable. Demanding that an empty or near-empty holding tank be
arbitrarily pumped is unreasonable. I have been told by local officials to
instruct boaters out of our marina that they are NOT to discharge once way
offshore during fishing trips. This is also unreasonable and it is perfectly
legal and acceptable for such boats to pumpout when well offshore (more than 3
miles atlantic side, and they sometimes fish 10-50 miles offshore). I personally
have two holding tanks onboard our boat, utilize the shoreside toilet for most
of our "business" and can generally go a month without pumping out. When I do
need to pumpout I either use the pumpout at our marina, or more often I go well
offshore and pumpout when I'm going out in the boat anyway. I enforce no
discharge in our own marina and have confronted boaters who have violated it. I
support clean marinas and believe in clean water. I also believe that what goes
around comes around, and that people are to be treated with dignity and respect
whether their foundation is a concrete slab or a keel. I also believe in our US
Constitution and that individuals are innocent of any crimes until proven
guilty. - Gregory Absten
Further in-depth discussion and
information for Boot Key Harbor is listed below

|
HARBOR MANAGEMENT ISSUES -
WATER QUALITY, HEADS & PUMPOUTS,
REGULATED ANCHORAGES, MOORINGS, HARBORMASTER, ETC
Implementation of the
Proposed No-Discharge Zone For the State Waters of the Florida Keys National
Marine Sanctuary
March 25, 2002 Draft Plan May 25th 2002 Keynoter Reports :
No-Discharge rule going into effect June 19, 2002. -- All State Waters
of the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary are a No Discharge Zone. This is absolutely
unnecessary. It was presented to the community as a law that prohibits the
discharge of human waste into near shore waters. That sounds like a valiant
cause, but it's false. Existing laws ALREADY prevent this. The reason the
No-Discharge zone was implemented was MONEY. Federal funds
became available for enforcement of the No-Discharge provisions, while local
money must be used to enforce the existing laws. This is done at the price
of increased layers of regulation - most of which local authorities say they
will "not" enforce - only the boaters discharge aspect. Multiple layers of increasing
and unnecessary regulation is never a good thing.
I personally opposed implementation of this plan because clean water was not
the honest reason this was pushed through. The plan itself acknowledges that existing laws are already sufficient to
enforce boaters pumping out sewage in near shore waters. This is NOT about
clean water. This IS about money. When the EPA was allowed to implement the
no-discharge zone keys wide, then federal money became available for local
operations. This also provides a footing for the EPA and the federal
government to exercise direct authority in the Keys in some situations where
they would otherwise have been prevented. I am supportive of utilizing federal subsidies where available
and appropriate. However, this rule saddles ALL the local community with
additional layers of laws and many more restrictions on what can be done in
Keys waters than is identified in this draft plan. Read it and see for
yourself. Then let your opinions be known. It's rather a moot point now
because it IS implemented, but a knowledgeable public is always a good thing
to prevent this type of shallow "sounds good" lawmaking from occurring in the future.
It was done to facilitate other political agendas - not to clean up the
water. It is also counter productive and will result in WORSE water quality
from legal boaters. Some boats contain onboard sanitation devices that
purify the discharge to a degree MUCH better than municipal treatment
plants. Now it's illegal for them to use them, instead pumping their raw
sewage into treatment plants at someplace like Key West, where it is treated
to only a fraction of the degree the boat would have, then discharging it
out a pipe a few hundred yards from the beach. Not too great for clean
water, but federal money does now come into local use.
You can look below for more information on water quality issues including
articles about EPA no discharge zones, holding tanks, and the harbor
committees original recommendations. This is in .PDF format so you must have
adobe acrobat reader to view it.
Water Quality - Sewage Pumpouts - Boat Heads - and EPA "No Discharge Zones"
This provides an extensive
explanation of current laws regulating discharge of sewage from boats (EPA
no discharge zones are unnecessary and redundant), EPA statistics on boaters
contribution to Keys water pollution (1.5%), a brochure on the Clean Water
Act, and several articles discussing boat heads and sewage. We recommend
that any vessel displaying a current "Vessel Safety Check" sticker from the
USCG Auxiliary or the US Power Squadrons be exempted from any safety or
head compliance inspections from law enforcement officers here in the Keys.
This page includes an article by Chuck Kanter, member of the original Boot
Key Harbor committee, on the counterproductive state of holding tanks and
pumpouts.
October 2002 Report from the City Marina on
Total Pump-Out Statistics
During a six month period in 2002, 672 pumpouts were provided to 162
vessels with an average of 29 gallons per pumpout. 94% of liveaboard
vessels have been pumped.
|
MARATHON CITY MARINA & MOORINGS
(MARATHON)
GO TO the CITY OF MARATHON
for current mooring and dockage rates for City Marina -
It's under "Departments" / "Marina"
However - they have not published their rules & regulations there -
they are listed above on this page. City & Marina
Officials - if you have updates to these please send them to
CapnGreg@BootKeyHarbor.com
Boot Key
Harbor Rules May 22, 2002: City Council adopted the regulations for the harbor, but
did so without incorporating the changes in the plan that they had agreed to
and promised would be included. Mayor John Bartus and Councilman Randy
Mearns objected (thank you both) to passing the regulations without the
agreed upon changes, but were outvoted. Maximum size boat on a mooring is 40
feet. Mooring fees are $150 monthly including dinghy dockage for stays of 6
months or longer, and $200 monthly for shorter stays, plus additional dinghy
dockage of $3 daily, $15 weekly or $50 monthly. In addition, for monthly
leases, you are required to pay a security deposit equal to the monthly fee.
There is some dissent on the council about this because including dinghy
dockage will now compete with private business in the harbor such as
dockside which also provides dinghy dockage / showers etc.. The prolific
rules are posted above on this page.
You can print out all these rules and regulations - Most are in Adobe
Acrobat Reader Format, so click on the icon at the left to get a free copy
if you don't already have it on your computer. They'll open in their own
page so once you print it (use the Adobe toolbar to print, not your browser
command) close the window to come back here.
I can't recommend staying at the City Marina or use their Moorings at
this time.
Where
have you ever cruised in your boat that had you sign for and submit to 24
pages of rules and regulations, not including 15 pages of the underlying
ordinance? This is overbearing regulation at its worst, and was probably
contrived by well meaning but nautically ignorant attorneys. You can't stay on a
mooring anyway if you're over 40'. You have plenty of other good
options including anchoring outside the mooring field, and at the following
marinas in the harbor (there are also plenty outside the harbor): *
Burdines Waterfront (west) * Sombrero Resort-Lighthouse Marina (east) *
*Harbourside Marina at Canon Marine
, *Faro Blanco Oceanside (west) *Marathon
Boatyard (central) *Marathon Marina (west but not recommended) * Pancho's
(west). CLICK HERE for listings of marinas in and around Marathon.
It is probably true that the City may eventually try to extend it's direct control
to all anchoring within the harbor, as their ordinance listed above
provides. I would encourage every local citizen to voice their opinions on
this to City Councilmen, and for cruising boaters to contact the Marathon
Chamber of Commerce and City Council and let them know your displeasure with
over regulation of the harbor. Local City Council members - please have these overbearing agreements
administratively reviewed and slimmed down to a one page simple agreement
that is balanced and fair for both the visiting boaters and the city - not a cya document drawn up by a landlocked attorney.
When these issues of "fairness" and balanced management of the harbor are
resolved I will become the city's biggest supporter.
February 2003: CITY OF MARATHON MARINA MASTER
PLAN. Click to go to the marina page and view sketches of the
proposed new facilities. -
Visit the
CITY website for updates any subsequent updates. |
|
"Regulated" anchorages
See the links above for a discussion of the legal issues and
anchoring rights
There are no current (July 2003)
restrictions on times allowed to anchor, and we recommend that NONE be
implemented. Previous proposals have included a very restricted and
temporary anchorage area, with a 72 hour limit on anchoring and requires ALL
anchored vessels to be registered and regulated. We believe that this is
both unnecessary and unreasonable. Many cruisers would consider a month as a
minimal stopping time for a harbor such as ours. Many wait 2-3 months for
the crossing to the Bahamas or the
Caribbean. We think this is
reasonable in boating terms. At minimum, a 30 day period should be permitted
(preferably 90 days for fairness)
prior to registering with the harbor master. Anchored boats should never be
required to immediately register or "check-in" in any way, though they
should observe all maritime laws. We also don't believe that every boater
should be forced to take and pay for a mooring buoy either. The real
problem has been people leaving their boats unattended for the long term in
the harbor as cheap (free) storage. We should address this problem because
these boats are usually the ones that go unattended and eventually sink and
foul the harbor. This can be done on a reasonable basis though by the
harbormaster routinely traversing the harbor (notice I did not say
patrolling) and noting the long term boats. It becomes apparent which ones
have been here for months or years unattended, and these should be removed.
It is undesirable to have each and every boat register when they enter the
harbor if they don't take a mooring buoy. Current marine regulations are
sufficient for regulation of boating within the harbor.
|
Mooring Buoy Fields
A limited Mooring Field is very useful for
the Harbor. The Boot Key Harbor Ad Hoc Committee, appointed by the County
Commissioners, recommended that NO MORE THAN 25 MOORING BUOYS be initially
placed. We suggest the placement of no more than 25 Mooring Buoys as
recommended by the County's original committee, and which is currently
(2002) installed. Further placement may be determined by demand and effects
on water quality. We recommend that at least 50% of good anchorage areas in
the harbor be retained, and that at no time should the mooring field size
exceed that of adequate anchorage. The entire purpose of a mooring field in
this context, as defined in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary plan,
is simply to keep boats in one geographical area so that pumpout services
(marina or honey barge) are more easily provided. Because the Harbor is
already confined geographically the mooring fields have little impact on
keeping the fleet together for easier sanitation purposes, unlike Key West
where anchored boats may be strung out over miles in various small harbors
and creeks. For Boot Key Harbor then the mooring
field has minimal impact on water quality issues and becomes one of
convenience for boaters and revenue generation for the city. We recommend
that any such moorings are built to the highest standard possible to
withstand hurricane forces. SEE THE ACTUAL MOORING LICENSE LISTED ABOVE. THE
MOORINGS WERE NOT BUILT TO HURRICANE STANDARDS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE
ORIGINAL HARBOR COMMITTEE.
|
|
Editorial Article In
Marathon Sail & Power
Squadron Newsletter
regarding stewardship of Boot Key Harbor (Sept 2001)
Unbridled Tourism?, vs. Quality of Life for Residents
|
Greg's Vision of a BKH
Harbormaster
Harbor Master - Ambassador
for the City of Marathon
We would make the emphasis and purpose of
the Harbor Master that of ambassador and host for the City of Marathon. A
Harbor Master (their representative) should visit every boat (moored or
anchored, - registered or not) as a kind of harbor "Welcome Wagon"
after they arrive. They
would provide an information packet to each boat which informed them of
available local services, and of regulations within the harbor (The Marathon Sail &
Power Squadron has such a packet they would be happy to provide to the City
for reproduction-
www.bootkeyharbor.com/power_squadron.htm). The Harbor Master would certainly
be responsible for management and collection of fees from the mooring fields
and other services, and oversee reasonable enforcement of harbor
regulations. Inspections or enforcements would be performed for cause only,
and would never be conducted as harbor sweeps. Under no situation should
boaters be forced to consent to boardings and inspection at any time without
cause. If the harbor master's other business duties prevent them
cruising the harbor each day for monitoring and welcoming boaters, then
it might be a good idea to solicit volunteers from boaters in the city
marina or moorings, and trade them a day of free slip rental for each day
they perform this function. They could carry the packet of information on
the harbor and Marathon with them to leave with new boats in the harbor,
register new boats at the moorings and assist boaters in any way they can.
What goes around, comes around, and this is the face we should show our
neighbors and visitors alike.
|
Other Harbor Issues:
- Derelict Vessels (partially or fully sunk) -
see the abandoned vessel discussion below
- Stored or Abandoned Vessels
- No Wake Zone - already implemented (Thank
You) - except the undeveloped (no boats) areas of Sisters Creek should
have the no wake area removed from it.
- Public Dinghy docks at winner marine basin
for access to Grocery & local stores. VERY Important.
- discussion to follow
- Development of the "Flats area" and City Marina
property as a harbor front boardwalk and nature observation area. (This is being addressed in the City Marina Masterplan.
Thank You - see above)
- Development of "Gullah-Gullah Island" (aka
West Sister Rock) as a community park for small boats & dinghies. (City to provide trash receptacle & removal)
- Use of "Dog Rock" (island in harbor at sister
creek) for signage for new boaters entering the harbor.
- Development of Boot Key
as planned wilderness
areas and small boat trails (versus a mega-resort).
- Preparation of Boot Key Harbor as a major port
for travel to/from Cuba - go to the
CUBA page on this website.
- Problem of night time navigation in the harbor.
This is a real problem now that the city park is in with it's bright
lights. I know the harbor very well but have extreme difficulty at night
now because of these very bright lights. Lights on the key daymarks are
now really a necessity. They weren't necessary before but the light
pollution is creating a serious navigational safety hazard in the harbor.
It's only a matter of time before someone gets hurt or creates unnecessary
property damage because of this situation. Now that the city is aware of this safety problem
(by reading it here) it should work
together with the Coast Guard to find funding for a minimum of 7 lights on
existing daymarks through the harbor. I would be happy to help facilitate
this along with the Power Squadron if requested.
|