Boot Key Harbor
"Marathon- the Heart of the Florida Keys"

An On-Line Cruising Guide for the Florida Keys & Cuba
Best viewed at 1024x768 or higher

Home

 

Boot Key Harbor Rules & Regulations - plus regulatory issues

 

*NOTE, Sept 2007: This page is now very outdated and has been temporarily removed from the Navigational Structure of the website. If you're here it's because a webcrawler still sees it, or we missed a link to break on this website.
The page will be redone in the future, but essentially only list the links for the City of Marathon, Harbormaster.
In the interim please call them for any information about moorings, or use of the City Marina.

CAUTIONARY NOTES FOR LOCAL POLITICIANS AND CANDIDATES, January 2003 - Reaffirmed July 2003: Please proceed with the utmost caution in any actions concerning this harbor. I am hearing increasing rhetoric  about "cleaning up" the harbor and making it "profitable" with moorings. Some that I hear this from have little knowledge or experience about navigational and anchoring rights and responsibilities (on both ends), or the true human value aspects of all the local boaters that live in this harbor. These are mostly good people who I would entrust with my life. You must refrain from over-regulating this harbor. Yes, a clean up of some of the derelict vessels is highly desired, and current marine and local laws on discharge should be reasonably enforced. Turning the harbor into a shiny but superficial tourist ornament is a gross disservice to the long term well being of our community. It should grow as a REAL maritime harbor for REAL cruisers as a crossroads to Cuba, the Bahamas, Leeward Islands and Central and South America. Do NOT make the harbor mostly moorings, and do NOT turn up the heat with local law enforcement on unnecessary and harassing boardings whose sole purpose is only to make it such a nuisance to be in the harbor that the locals will be driven out. This will leave the harbor sterilized of its character and open only for the transient tourists. I'm told by reliable sources  that this is the prime intent of some of the big developers for this harbor - up to the point of building the mega resort on Boot Key whose view is not to be "tarnished" by all the locals in the harbor. For those of you that have been empowered by us as citizens to help manage our community, please recognize that while making money is productive for our lives up to a point, there also comes a point of diminishing returns where the quality of life for the community overall is degraded in order for a few to make increasing profits. We really do NOT want to become an annex of Duval street here in Marathon. We must stake our claim now for a fully nautically functioning and fair harbor - especially as Cuba opens up in the next few years. For those of you new on the political scene I'd like you to be aware that there have been several Boot Key Harbor advisory committees over the years. Even though the participating members were sincere and honest in their efforts, the local county and city authorities who commissioned these committees have used them mostly as a show piece so they could present an image of credible public input. Historically anyway nothing could be farther from the truth. Almost all of the good recommendations by these committees have been ignored entirely, or distorted out of context. There is enough information here, both with the full reports of previous committees and my discussion of current laws and regulations, to give you a full and balanced view of issues concerning the harbor. I believe that serving in public office is an honorable calling, and there are still those with the dignity, courage and selflessness to steward this valuable resource called Boot Key Harbor that we have been entrusted with. Please be one of them.               - Gregory Absten, Marathon

NATIONAL LIVEABOARD THREAT
Article Sept-Oct 2003 Passagemaker Magazine - 972kb large file (broadband suggested)- Includes discussion of Boot Key Harbor here in Marathon

HISTORY OF PROPOSED REGULATIONS:

Previously Proposed Harbor Management Plans
- County - 1999-2000 -

Listed here for comparison and history

BOOT KEY HARBOR AD HOC COMMITTEE's
Goals, Option, And Solutions
for Boot Key Harbor,
Marathon Key - 1997
(The 1997 report of the Ad Hoc Harbor Advisory Committee - Endorsed by this Website, but current regulations are not consistent with this report)


Download free copy of Acrobat Reader

2003 City of Marathon Marina Regulations
(also covers moorings in the Harbor):

City of Marathon Website

Regulatory & Legislative Issues Regarding Anchoring & Liveaboards:

Anchoring Away: Government Regulations and
The Rights of Navigation in Florida (pdf file 33pages)

Thomas T Ankersen,  Richard Hamann
Center for Governmental Responsibility
University of Florida, Levin College of Law

Boat Liveaboards in the Florida Keys
a New Factor in Waterfront Development (1990)

University of Florida, Florida Sea Grant Program
VERY Large File - we suggest a broadband connection - takes a long time
A look at the financial contribution that liveaboards make to the local economy, and discussion of conflicts that occur between use of shoreline and community resources between land and water dwellers. pdf file 204 pages.

Website - Florida SeaGrant
Local Restrictions on Anchoring in SW Florida (2003)

University of Florida, Florida Sea Grant Program
This is a summary of the SW Florida Regional Harbor Boards efforts to "harmonize" local restrictions on anchoring in various harbors in Punta Gorda, Naples, Marco Island, Cape Coral, Ft Myers, Ft Myers Beach, Sanibel, Bradenton, Palmetto, Longboat Key, Sarasota and Venice. It includes access to the full text of every Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the regional harbor board and each of these communities.

Boot Key Harbor is in the development stages of a management plan for the Harbor - currently by the City of Marathon. Here you'll find the official recommendations of this Boot Key Harbor website, on a balanced approach to management of the Harbor by the City of Marathon. These are the informed editorial views of the webmaster and are recommendations to the City and Marathon residents. We also reference related issues and existing laws such as the clean water act. In a nutshell, this website endorses the original recommendations of the Boot Key Harbor Advisory Committee, and you'll find the link to that complete report lower on this page. Essentially those recommendations included a mooring field which would be LIMITED to 25 moorings (not the entire harbor), preserved most existing anchorages, opened up canals for water flow in/out of the harbor, and made a "honey-barge" and pumpouts available in the harbor. The position of the harbor master - currently the City Marina Dockmaster - should be one of Ambassador for the City of Marathon, in contrast to primarily a law enforcement officer. Boats that are moored or anchored in the harbor long term (more than one month) should be registered with the harbormaster. This should expose those boats that are simply "stored" here as cheap long-term storage, and this should not be permitted. That would help us eliminate many of the derelict boats that are simply left in the harbor to eventually sink. All boats in the harbor should be navigationally operational and registered. This means that some floating contrivances such as makeshift barges might have to be removed, but it does NOT imply that boats which are simply unattractive should be moved. The single most important difference in Boot Key Harbor and any other harbor is it’s large, full time liveaboard population. By and large, these are decent, respectable people - many of whom are very well educated. They are incredibly important to our local economy because a huge segment of our service workers come from here. Sterilize the harbor and you’ve lost character, good neighbors and much of the work force in Marathon. Arrangements with the Bay Bottom in the harbor - between State, County and City, is very important to ensure that there are no time limits imposed on anchored boats in this harbor, so that liveaboards remain possible - without having to take a mooring if they so choose. The city should formally recognize this as a defacto residential community, whether or not it meets technical definitions of a legal domicile.


Code of Federal Regulations on No Discharge in the Keys:

EPA No Discharge Zone Code of Federal Regulations Document (also pdf) May 2002 Final Rule
for further info or map of pump-out facilities go to www.co.monroe.fl.us/ndz/info.htm
or reef relief at www.reefrelief.org

For Clarification purposes, this CFR (Code of Federal Regulations - 40 CFR Part 140) contains the following provisions. I list them here because local enforcement officials in Marathon imply that these alternatives are invalid and attempt to impose personal agenda's on enforcement of this CFR. Read it in it's entirety (above) to see what it really says. Among them:

  • p9, paragraph 3 - a portable toilet is an ACCEPTABLE alternative to a type III MSD (Holding Tank)

  • p9, paragraph 3 - Shoreside toilet facilities, such as at a marina, is an ACCEPTABLE alternative to a Holding Tank.

  • p11, paragraph 5 - Type I & II Marine Sanitation Devices are disallowed in the No Discharge Zone (These systems treat the wastewater more effectively than shoreside wastewater facilities but do not remove nutrients like Nitrogen and Phosphorus). The are specifically disallowed because of the discharge of Nutrients. This page states that wastewater nutrients from ALL vessels throughout the Keys is estimated to be only 2.8-3% of the total nutrients discharged into near shore waters of the Florida Keys.

  • p12, paragraph 4 - The no discharge applies ONLY to State Waters of the FKNMS. It is legal to pumpout past the state water limit, and certainly outside of the FKNMS boundaries. This is what we and many other boaters do when underway offshore. (The no discharged zone is mapped at http://www.fknms.nos.noaa.gov/

MY POSITION on no discharge, pumpouts and "clean marinas": Don't mistake my objections to enforcement issues with objections to clean water. Pumping your poop in near shore waters, especially marinas, canals and the harbor, is uncouth and unacceptable. However, we already had laws  that prevented such discharge. I do believe in responsible boaters exercising responsible alternatives. Many boaters in marinas choose to use the shoreside facilities because its much easier and less work in maintaining their onboard system. The CFR's recognize this as perfectly acceptable, but I've heard local officials bluntly state that this is not acceptable and demand that these boats pump out. My objections are with such arbitrary and misleading enforcement. The law does NOT REQUIRE that one pumpout, only that you abstain from discharging into the water. This is perfectly reasonable. Demanding that an empty or near-empty holding tank be arbitrarily pumped is unreasonable. I have been told by local officials to instruct boaters out of our marina that they are NOT to discharge once way offshore during fishing trips. This is also unreasonable and it is perfectly legal and acceptable for such boats to pumpout when well offshore (more than 3 miles atlantic side, and they sometimes fish 10-50 miles offshore). I personally have two holding tanks onboard our boat, utilize the shoreside toilet for most of our "business" and can generally go a month without pumping out. When I do need to pumpout I either use the pumpout at our marina, or more often I go well offshore and pumpout when I'm going out in the boat anyway. I enforce no discharge in our own marina and have confronted boaters who have violated it. I support clean marinas and believe in clean water. I also believe that what goes around comes around, and that people are to be treated with dignity and respect whether their foundation is a concrete slab or a keel. I also believe in our US Constitution and that individuals are innocent of any crimes until proven guilty. - Gregory Absten


Further in-depth discussion and information for Boot Key Harbor is listed below 


HARBOR MANAGEMENT ISSUES - WATER QUALITY, HEADS & PUMPOUTS,
REGULATED ANCHORAGES, MOORINGS, HARBORMASTER, ETC

Implementation of the Proposed No-Discharge Zone For the State Waters of the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary
March 25, 2002  Draft Plan

May 25th 2002 Keynoter Reports : No-Discharge rule going into effect June 19, 2002. -- All State Waters of the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary are a No Discharge Zone. This is absolutely unnecessary. It was presented to the community as a law that prohibits the discharge of human waste into near shore waters. That sounds like a valiant cause, but it's false.  Existing laws ALREADY prevent this. The reason the No-Discharge zone was implemented was MONEY. Federal funds became available for enforcement of the No-Discharge provisions, while local money must be used to enforce the existing laws. This is done at the price of increased layers of regulation - most of which local authorities say they will "not" enforce - only the boaters discharge aspect. Multiple layers of increasing and unnecessary regulation is never a good thing.

I personally opposed implementation of this plan because clean water was not the honest reason this was pushed through. The plan itself acknowledges that existing laws are already sufficient to enforce boaters pumping out sewage in near shore waters. This is NOT about clean water. This IS about money. When the EPA was allowed to implement the no-discharge zone keys wide, then federal money became available for local operations. This also provides a footing for the EPA and the federal government to exercise direct authority in the Keys in some situations where they would otherwise have been prevented. I am supportive of utilizing federal subsidies where available and appropriate. However, this rule saddles ALL the local community with additional layers of laws and many more restrictions on what can be done in Keys waters than is identified in this draft plan. Read it and see for yourself. Then let your opinions be known. It's rather a moot point now because it IS implemented, but a knowledgeable public is always a good thing to prevent this type of  shallow "sounds good" lawmaking from occurring in the future. It was done to facilitate other political agendas - not to clean up the water. It is also counter productive and will result in WORSE water quality from legal boaters. Some boats contain onboard sanitation devices that purify the discharge to a degree MUCH better than municipal treatment plants. Now it's illegal for them to use them, instead pumping their raw sewage into treatment plants at someplace like Key West, where it is treated to only a fraction of the degree the boat would have, then discharging it out a pipe a few hundred yards from the beach. Not too great for clean water, but federal money does now come into local use.

You can look below for more information on water quality issues including articles about EPA no discharge zones, holding tanks, and the harbor committees original recommendations. This is in .PDF format so you must have adobe acrobat reader to view it.

Water Quality - Sewage Pumpouts - Boat Heads - and EPA "No Discharge Zones"
This provides an extensive explanation of current laws regulating discharge of sewage from boats (EPA no discharge zones are unnecessary and redundant), EPA statistics on boaters contribution to Keys water pollution (1.5%), a brochure on the Clean Water Act, and several articles discussing boat heads and sewage. We recommend that any vessel displaying a current "Vessel Safety Check" sticker from the USCG Auxiliary or the US Power Squadrons be exempted from any safety or head compliance inspections from law enforcement officers here in the Keys. This page includes an article by Chuck Kanter, member of the original Boot Key Harbor committee, on the counterproductive state of holding tanks and pumpouts.

October 2002 Report from the City Marina on Total Pump-Out Statistics
During a six month period in 2002, 672 pumpouts were provided to 162 vessels with an average of 29 gallons per pumpout. 94% of  liveaboard vessels have been pumped.
 

MARATHON CITY MARINA & MOORINGS (MARATHON)

GO TO the CITY OF MARATHON for current mooring and dockage rates for City Marina -
It's under "Departments" / "Marina"
However - they have not published their rules & regulations there  - they are listed above on this page.

City & Marina Officials - if you have updates to these please send them to CapnGreg@BootKeyHarbor.com

Boot Key Harbor Rules May 22, 2002:  City Council adopted the regulations for the harbor, but did so without incorporating the changes in the plan that they had agreed to and promised would be included. Mayor John Bartus and Councilman Randy Mearns objected (thank you both) to passing the regulations without the agreed upon changes, but were outvoted. Maximum size boat on a mooring is 40 feet. Mooring fees are $150 monthly including dinghy dockage for stays of 6 months or longer, and $200 monthly for shorter stays, plus additional dinghy dockage of $3 daily, $15 weekly or $50 monthly. In addition, for monthly leases, you are required to pay a security deposit equal to the monthly fee. There is some dissent on the council about this because including dinghy dockage will now compete with private business in the harbor such as dockside which also provides dinghy dockage / showers etc.. The prolific rules are posted above on this page.

You can print out all these rules and regulations - Most are in Adobe Acrobat Reader Format, so click on the icon at the left to get a free copy if you don't already have it on your computer. They'll open in their own page so once you print it (use the Adobe toolbar to print, not your browser command) close the window to come back here.
 

 I can't recommend staying at the City Marina or use their Moorings at this time. Where have you ever cruised in your boat that had you sign for and submit to 24 pages of rules and regulations, not including 15 pages of the underlying ordinance? This is overbearing regulation at its worst, and was probably contrived by well meaning but nautically ignorant attorneys. You can't stay on a mooring anyway if you're over 40'. You have plenty of other good  options including anchoring outside the mooring field, and at the following marinas in the harbor (there are also plenty outside the harbor):  * Burdines Waterfront (west) * Sombrero Resort-Lighthouse Marina (east) * *Harbourside Marina at Canon Marine , *Faro Blanco Oceanside (west) *Marathon Boatyard (central) *Marathon Marina (west but not recommended) * Pancho's (west). CLICK HERE for listings of marinas in and around Marathon. It is probably true that the City may eventually try to extend it's direct control to all anchoring within the harbor, as their ordinance listed above provides. I would encourage every local citizen to voice their opinions on this to City Councilmen, and for cruising boaters to contact the Marathon Chamber of Commerce and City Council and let them know your displeasure with over regulation of the harbor. Local City Council members - please have these overbearing agreements administratively reviewed and slimmed down to a one page simple agreement that is balanced and fair for both the visiting boaters and the city - not a cya  document drawn up by a landlocked attorney. When these issues of "fairness" and balanced management of the harbor are resolved I will become the city's biggest supporter.

February 2003: CITY OF MARATHON MARINA MASTER PLAN. Click to go to the marina page and view sketches of the proposed new facilities. -
Visit the CITY website for updates any subsequent updates.

"Regulated" anchorages
See the links above for a discussion of the legal issues and anchoring rights
There are no current (July 2003) restrictions on times allowed to anchor, and we recommend that NONE be implemented. Previous proposals have included a very restricted and temporary anchorage area, with a 72 hour limit on anchoring and requires ALL anchored vessels to be registered and regulated. We believe that this is both unnecessary and unreasonable. Many cruisers would consider a month as a minimal stopping time for a harbor such as ours. Many wait 2-3 months for the crossing to the Bahamas or the Caribbean. We think this is reasonable in boating terms. At minimum, a 30 day period should be permitted (preferably 90 days for fairness)  prior to registering with the harbor master. Anchored boats should never be required to immediately register or "check-in" in any way, though they should observe all maritime laws. We also don't believe that every boater should be forced to take and pay for a mooring buoy either.  The real problem has been people leaving their boats unattended for the long term in the harbor as cheap (free) storage. We should address this problem because these boats are usually the ones that go unattended and eventually sink and foul the harbor. This can be done on a reasonable basis though by the harbormaster routinely traversing the harbor (notice I did not say patrolling) and noting the long term boats. It becomes apparent which ones  have been here for months or years unattended, and these should be removed. It is undesirable to have each and every boat register when they enter the harbor if they don't take a mooring buoy. Current marine regulations are sufficient for regulation of boating within the harbor.
 

Mooring Buoy Fields

A limited Mooring Field is very useful for the Harbor. The Boot Key Harbor Ad Hoc Committee, appointed by the County Commissioners, recommended that NO MORE THAN 25 MOORING BUOYS be initially placed.  We suggest the placement of no more than 25 Mooring Buoys as recommended by the County's original committee, and which is currently (2002) installed. Further placement may be determined by demand and effects on water quality. We recommend that at least 50% of good anchorage areas in the harbor be retained, and that at no time should the mooring field size exceed that of adequate anchorage. The entire purpose of a mooring field in this context, as defined in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary plan, is simply to keep boats in one geographical area so that pumpout services (marina or honey barge) are more easily provided. Because the Harbor is already confined geographically the mooring fields have little impact on keeping the fleet together for easier sanitation purposes, unlike Key West where anchored boats may be strung out over miles in various small harbors and creeks. For Boot Key Harbor then the mooring field has minimal impact on water quality issues and becomes one of convenience for boaters and revenue generation for the city. We recommend that any such moorings are built to the highest standard possible to withstand hurricane forces. SEE THE ACTUAL MOORING LICENSE LISTED ABOVE. THE MOORINGS WERE NOT BUILT TO HURRICANE STANDARDS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ORIGINAL HARBOR COMMITTEE.

Editorial Article In Marathon Sail & Power Squadron Newsletter
regarding stewardship of Boot Key Harbor (Sept 2001)
Unbridled Tourism?,  vs. Quality of Life for Residents

Greg's Vision of a BKH Harbormaster

Harbor Master - Ambassador for the City of Marathon

We would make the emphasis and purpose of the Harbor Master  that of ambassador and host for the City of Marathon. A Harbor Master (their representative) should visit every boat (moored or anchored, - registered or not) as a kind of harbor "Welcome Wagon" after they arrive. They would provide an information packet to each boat which informed them of available local services, and of regulations within the harbor (The Marathon Sail & Power Squadron has such a packet they would be happy to provide  to the City for reproduction- www.bootkeyharbor.com/power_squadron.htm).  The Harbor Master  would certainly be responsible for management and collection of fees from the mooring fields and other services, and oversee reasonable enforcement of harbor regulations. Inspections or enforcements would be performed for cause only, and would never be conducted as harbor sweeps. Under no situation should boaters be forced to consent to boardings and inspection at any time without cause.

If the harbor master's other business duties prevent them cruising the harbor each day for monitoring and welcoming boaters, then it might be a good idea to solicit volunteers from boaters in the city marina or moorings, and trade them a day of free slip rental for each day they perform this function. They could carry the packet of information on the harbor and Marathon with them to leave with new boats in the harbor, register new boats at the moorings and assist boaters in any way they can.

What goes around, comes around, and this is the face we should show our neighbors and visitors alike.
 

Other Harbor Issues:

  • Derelict Vessels (partially or fully sunk) - see the abandoned vessel discussion below
  • Stored or Abandoned Vessels
  • No Wake Zone - already implemented (Thank You) - except the undeveloped (no boats) areas of Sisters Creek should have the no wake area removed from it.
  • Public Dinghy docks at winner marine basin for access to Grocery & local stores. VERY Important. - discussion to follow
  • Development of the "Flats area" and City Marina property as a harbor front boardwalk and nature observation area. (This is being addressed in the City Marina Masterplan. Thank You - see above)
  • Development of "Gullah-Gullah Island" (aka West Sister Rock) as a community park for small boats & dinghies. (City to provide trash receptacle & removal)
  • Use of "Dog Rock" (island in harbor at sister creek) for signage for new boaters entering the harbor.
  • Development of Boot Key as planned wilderness areas and small boat trails (versus a mega-resort).
  • Preparation of Boot Key Harbor as a major port for travel to/from Cuba - go to the CUBA page on this website.
  • Problem of night time navigation in the harbor. This is a real problem now that the city park is in with it's bright lights. I know the harbor very well but have extreme difficulty at night now because of these very bright lights. Lights on the key daymarks are now really a necessity. They weren't necessary before but the light pollution is creating a serious navigational safety hazard in the harbor. It's only a matter of time before someone gets hurt or creates unnecessary property damage because of this situation. Now that the city is aware of this safety problem (by reading it here) it should work together with the Coast Guard to find funding for a minimum of 7 lights on existing daymarks through the harbor. I would be happy to help facilitate this along with the Power Squadron if requested.
     

Boot Key Harbor website created and maintained by Capt. Gregory T. Absten, Marathon.  - A Boater's Guide to the Florida Keys & Cuba
Copyright 2000-2008 Gregory T. Absten